Censorship from the Right and Censorship from the Left both introduced me to ideas that I really didn't know that much about. I didn't really understand what people hoped to achieve by censoring certain material and not allowing students to be exposed to different ideas that were deemed dangerous. The Right believes that, "children will be shaped by what they read and will model their behavior on what they read" while the Left believes that they can create a Utopian society by limiting what children read. My main problem with these views is that where did the first idea of violence come from? Many original ideas come from a person's mind and aren't always influenced by what they read or see. Sometimes it's just their own imagination and how can you censor some one's imagination?
These readings reminded me of a book I read in high school titled "Fahrenheit 451" which described a world where the firefighters set fires instead of putting them out. The main idea in this book was a certain group of people deemed what books were acceptable to be read and all other books were to be burnt but no one knew why these books were deemed dangerous. Everyone just followed the directions they were given with out questions until the protagonist becomes curious and begins to read one of the books that were labeled dangerous. I don't remember most of the details but the point is that the books that were seen as dangerous were books that expressed ideas that the people in power did not agree with and this was the only reason they were burnt. This way of life doesn't leave room for someone to think for them self and creates a population with only one way of thinking that are controllable.
The solution that I can suggest to deal with the type of information students are being exposed to and censorship is to allow teachers to teach what they view as important to their class. Allow open class discussions by ensuring a safe and accepting atmosphere. Fully explain the topic and allow students to question or argue with the ideals. By banning books and not allowing certain material to be taught this only makes the students want to seek out this information even more. There is no guarantee that the student will understand what they are reading if someone isn't there to help them. For example, on page 81 in Censorship from the Left it says, "Twain's use of the word nigger will ensure that Huckleberry Finn remains controversial long into the future." If we attempt to erase this word in a few decades we will forget it ever existed and with it will go the history of slavery. When we try to erase or forget things it increases the possibility of repeating the same mistakes but if we explain these events and show why they should never occur again it helps our future.
This link breaks down censorship, the First Amendment, and how it effects teachers, their teaching styles, and the students. It defines things such as age appropriate, roles, and responsibilities. It ties into my suggestion of what we can do about censorship and how we can ensure that students are appropriately exposed to different ideas.
http://www.ncac.org/education/schools/
Friday, November 16, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I liked your thinking about a solution. To expand on it, I think that when teachers present their views/opinions, they need to explain that the views are subjective (that the views of the teachers' opinions and are not presented as a one true fact) and why they think that way and need to reassure students that they are allowed to have their own opinion even if it differs from her. Because of the way education has been structured for so many years, teachers are still a big authority figure, and students might not question the opinion/view presented unless the teacher encourages it. The teacher should also encourage students to research the topic and to present their views in class and give feedback about how to better validate their opinions.
Or, instead of presenting their personal views, I think a better idea is for the teacher to present views that are different from the text books. Some teachers may feel uncomfortable vocalizing their opinions because they are role models or may not want to offend students with their opinions -- so offering, instead, that the teacher just presents some different views may be a better way to approach the situation.
I agree with you completely. You canot censor someones imagination and I neevr really thought about this idea until right now. Fahrenheit 451 sounds like an excellent book and I wouldn't be surprised if that book is listed as a banned book. I think you gave some excellent soultuions. As long as teachers are their to mediate and help run discussions there should not be a problem with allowing students to read and explore ideas and discuss them freely.
By the way Fahrenheit 451 is on the banned books list.lol. Ironic? ha! I love your solutions. Here is what came to mind as I was reading your blog though: What if a teacher who is a member of the KKK decides to teach Huck Finn to her class of white students? Would we still disagree with censorship?
Yes, the imaginations of children can definitely run wild. You bring up a good point of nature vs. nurture. Is there a point to censorship when nature might determine a person's aggression and lead to future violence? Personally, I am more for the nurture side, I believe that children must, at some point, be influenced. Perhaps some sort of censorship prevents aggressive acts in children.
Post a Comment